Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those simple web 1.0 sites made by college professors are a gold-standard in my book. I always enjoy finding them in search results. Although they are becoming increasingly rare.


Paul's Notes remains the absolute best textbook Calculus and intro to DiffEQ! Not sure if it's been updated since 2005, but I mean, it's not like they're discovering new Calc II methods! Being that it's not a $200 textbook rehashing the same stuff as the last 10 editions, it's easily one of my favorite websites


Can't prove it, but it seems to me like black text on white background sites from the past are poorly ranked compared to sites with "modern" layouts.


Yes. I love black text on white background. A rare find these days.

Browsing today is like: “You ask for a spaghetti recipe and the page tell you the whole history of civilization.”


Don't forget how Google will now drop search terms if it thinks you mean something else, or add unrelated synonyms to your search (presumably to "help" folks who aren't good at writing queries)


At least it still lets you force whatever you write in...

Allegro (big polish auction/e-commerce site) in their mobile app will unconditionally rewrite the search terms instead of showing you no results


Thats specific to recipes because they can’t be copyrighted


I heard that before and have trouble believing this is the cause at least for Internet recipes. Sure for a recipe book in 1950, but are recipe content farms going to sue each other? Isn't the lawyer costs way more than could be gained?


I had a look and definitely learned something today so #til.

Also, note to self to collect my favourite recipes in markdown files from now on.



They're even better than black text on white backgrounds. They're unstyled and use your browser default styling. granted it's rare anyone configured those so it's almost always black on white.. but for people who do specify their own preferences it's really nice to have them respected and not rely on hacking in my own css or js to override theirs


I have a website that is just a few black text on white HTML files I maintain in whatever text editor I have at hand. Loads lightning fast, and if you cannot view it, its not a web browser. Last I checked, the total site size was about 60KB.

As time goes on, even the amount of text I am putting out get trimmed down. Make the words count, don't count the words.


Further, is it true that Google factors in whether sites have ads?


Unfortunately, that's a trivial signal to emulate.

At a minimum, you'd have to validate them by confirming existence in the Wayback Machine.

Otherwise agreed that those are indeed high-signal documents. Increasing reliance on integrated educational software means that even such things as online syllabi are increasingly rare.


The type of sites GP is talking about are typically hosted on .edu servers, under faculty webhosting (often featuring a "/~profname/" in the url). That's a non-trivial signal.


~/name at an edu is pretty attainable.

.edu domains can be had for any otherwise eligible "U.S.-based postsecondary institutions" per Educause: <https://net.educause.edu/eligibility.htm>

Pages at extant domains might variously be available to undergraduate or graduate students, faculty, staff, and adjuncts. Those might either directly host emulative material or be convinced or compromised into hosting content.

If there's one thing that the Internet's history to date has proved, its that perverse incentives lead to perverse consequences.


It is not easy for a regular person to obtain access to a .edu webpage.


A "regular person" can:

- Enroll or be hired at an eligible institution. There are literally thousands of these.

- Bribe or compromise someone enrolled or hired at an eligible institution.

- Create a de novo eligible institution. For-profit colleges are not uncommon.

Someone motivated by profit or advantage would likely find virtually any of these options quite straightforward.

I'm ... somewhat pained that this needs to be spelled out.


> Enroll or be hired at an eligible institution. There are literally thousands of these

You don’t generally get the kind of personal website being discussed to my understanding.

> Bribe or compromise someone enrolled or hired at an eligible institution

Finding a professor willing to stake their job and reputation for such a blatantly immoral scam seems hard.

> Create a de novo eligible institution

Is it actually easy for a regular person to create their own college?

I find the snarky finish to your comment obnoxious.


A "regular person" also can:

- start their own country and call it Edunistan

- bribe ICANN to take over the .edu TLD

- open a university in the new country

- spend 15 years earning a PhD at that university

- reserve ~/name and start posting LLM generated content


search.marginalia.nu is a great place to find those sites, and some more interesting stuff besides.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: