Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Australia is about 1% of global CO2 emissions. I'm not arguing for being careless, of course, but either way it's not going to change much.


Australia supplies a large fraction of the coal burned by Japan, China, Korea and India. Mentioning the CO2 emissions of Australia itself is missing the point completely.


We are the largest global exporter of coal with over two hundred million tonnes sent to other countries to burn last year.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/mar/29/chinas-p...


[flagged]


We are probably going to have to transition, because the world will make this happen for us shortly.


The world will stop buying Australian coal? China is still building plenty of coal power plants.


I thought you said we only contribute to 1% of carbon emissions?


Yes. I was contesting your point about the world making Australia transition. Right now they're buying more of it.

Now, you can try to run on a platform of banning those exports, but it's a tough sell because it affects the revenue of many voters, and Australia is a democracy. It's tough to vote away someone else's living.

Hillary Clinton bragged about putting coal miners out of a job (something she later admitted was stupid) and got an electoral defeat in West Virginia.


There are over 40 countries that contribute to at least 1% of global carbon. If each one of them takes this ridiculous stance, we won’t be easily able to reduce our carbon footprint.

Your argument is pretty awful.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: