This is the second comment that mentions an iPhone - what's the catch?

It's the same person. They probably found God inside their Apple device. Not much different than seeing Jesus on a burnt slice of toast.

Yeah, I somehow missed looking at the username.

You give your heart to Jesus. You give your data to Apple.

Amen

no, the OP says it in a different sense, namely that even if you are duly impressed by these advancements, they will stop in a few years and a new line of research will be needed

Yeah, that's the issue, the autospotter is not perfect. Maybe someone from HN could enlighten us.

There's novelsworth of moderator commentary on dupes, the HN search thing will dig them up for you.

The new physics is not in the 4.7 but that in that the model's third and fourth variables seem to be new, compared to the known models.

They seem to be uncorrelated with real-world physics. Whether they are "new" is anybody's guess. They're variables identified in a virtual environment, rather than the real world so there's very little chance they correspond to something in the real world, let alone physics, much less "new physics".

I saw it commented somewhere that epicycles (of astronomical fame) are essentially additional terms in a Fourier series.

I suppose anything nonlinear could invite multiple terms incidental to a particular local fit.

This quote came to mind when seeing the title but I could not remember the source (read it in high-school, I think before learning formally about derivatives). I'm glad someone found it.

That collection of posts/comments is highly misleading.

Better just to search for the subject on reddit.

Picking one entry at random: ordinary differential equations. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xg3hXCYQPJkwHyik2/the-best-t...

The corresponding reddit search: https://old.reddit.com/search?q=ordinary+differential+equati...

Draw your own conclusions. From any source, that's what you'll have to do in the end. In this sample, it happens I've skimmed the lesswrong thread's recommended book and thought it looked much more interesting than the text I learned from years before (Boyce & diPrima). The reddit thread seems pretty barren in glancing through the results summary.

I would never even consider buying an Apple product due to the price.

Obligatory link to ACX review: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/book-review-sadly-porn

They also did that with Scholze in 2018.

Makes sense, it’s a big investment to write such a detailed, quality article.

She is, I expected her to win in 2018.