>I would probably feel differently about the pricing if it were tiered levels (e.g.: 1-50 servers: $x/mo, 50-250 servers: $y/mo, 250+ servers: $z/mo).
Ya, that's fair and a good suggestion. I think we may very well end up doing something like that. We're still trying to figure out what kind of model best suits the server fleets people have.
We'll be keeping the first server free, and probably have a not for profit tier.
As an added note, $9 per server doesn't seem excessive when I think of our large bare metal servers, but it starts looking _really_ pricy if I look at our $50/mo m3.mediums in AWS.
Ya, that's fair and a good suggestion. I think we may very well end up doing something like that. We're still trying to figure out what kind of model best suits the server fleets people have.
We'll be keeping the first server free, and probably have a not for profit tier.