I've seen this article several times now, and every time it has been equally impenetrable. I think one of the major flaws is that this sentence appears in the 10th paragraph:
"To evaluate the nothing-to-hide argument, we should begin by looking at how its adherents understand privacy"
Why do we only begin to evaluate the argument in the 10th paragraph?
This article has gravely serious implications, but it is needlessly long.
I'm not from the TL;DR crowd, but this is TL;NC (Not Cogent)
"To evaluate the nothing-to-hide argument, we should begin by looking at how its adherents understand privacy"
Why do we only begin to evaluate the argument in the 10th paragraph?
This article has gravely serious implications, but it is needlessly long.
I'm not from the TL;DR crowd, but this is TL;NC (Not Cogent)