Don't take this the wrong way, but if everyone you are encountering is screwing you...you have some hard questions to ask yourself.
My experience has been that when someone "only expects bad things from people when they depnd on them" it means one of 3 things.
1. They have a hard time accepting responsibility and taking ownership of their own problems.
2. They are running with a really bad crowd, and need to go to the library to make some new friends.
3. They project an image that lets people walk all over them.
Everyone has problems that come up in their life, but if you haven't experienced nice people as being the norm... there is a better that 66% chance its something YOU ALONE CAN AND MUST CHANGE.
Not taken, but don't get me wrong. I don't mean friends/family/coworkers. I've got plenty of those that I can and have trusted.
I mean Bosses and people that I've done business with on a you pay me level. In those cases there was almost nothing I could do besides filling a lawsuit and spending large amounts of money, time and sanity. I settled with the understanding that they had the upper hand and I was a fool for trusting my money/time to them.
One case:
Owner "Shit you are leaving??? Who is going to do XXX? Can't you stay at least until xxx so we can deliver xxx and save our asses? That is our only client right now."
Me
"Hum... I really need to start next week, but I will do my best"
I stayed for one month more that I needed in contract, my new employer was pissed but agreed with it. In the end the Owner didn't pay me my leave that was due and was agreed to be paid and delayed the pay of that last month for 15 days. I had to threaten them with a lawsuit to get that last month payment.
That sucks. I thought I was the only guy who had to have those kinds of experiences. :-)
In my case it was years ago, and since then my situation has improved dramatically. The things that seemed to help were:
1) Identifying the kinds of people I worked well with in the past and pitching those kinds of people on projects (I did some of this by learning the Meyers-Briggs function stack, which unfortunately doesn't have an axis of evil but is otherwise helpful in finding new clients who are somewhat similar to clients I liked in the past; ENFPs are a perennial favorite)
2) Identifying non-profits and other less rip-offy types of clients and showing them how I could help them
3) Saving enough money that I didn't have to work with any given client
4) Establishing firm policies like "You will pay 100% down if X and Y conditions are not met or do not apply, or if the total is below $N; otherwise 50% down and 50% prior to delivery"
5) Doing background-checking on all new clients, especially if they have fired one of my kind before (I usually call up the fired guy).
#4 really rides on your reputation, so you may wish to have references on hand to give to potential clients.
I'm celebrating my ninth year as a solo freelancer in rural California and things couldn't get much better, so I hope this helps you somehow.
> I settled with the understanding that they had the upper hand
Sounds like #3 is your primary concern. While some situations are beyond your control, you should put some effort into understanding perception and how you can manufacture the perception that you have the upper hand, not them.
The simplest example of this is Dan Kennedy's takeaway selling technique..Basically you make it seem like you are unavailable to work with them, and because people want what they can't have, they stop thinking about whether they want you but rather how to get you. This puts you in the drivers seat.
I worked in an industry which was tightly squeezed by government regulation. Every business I know which was run honestly and reputably had to close.
Those that remain are exclusively run by people who are willing to break any rules and any laws as it suits them and are intelligent enough to do so when they can get away with it. I feel very jaded by this experience. Is this what people really mean when they talk about 'hustle'? Is it not possible for an honest person to run a business?
In another context you would call these people sociopaths. They are happy to screw employees - and the conditions are currently just right for them to do that.
Good people who have skills or personal interest in that industry now have to work for that kind of person. They have no realistic choice.
You alone can and must change - we can agree - but your three options are not true to life.
This is actually really great advice - albeit a bit harsh. #2 makes sense, but any advice on solving #1 and #3? Is this yours or did you read about this somewhere?
#1 - Go through psychotherapy until you root out your self defeating behaviors.
#3 - There is a ton you can do to foster and project and image the leads to more positive results. I would recommend reading up on human perception and branding to better understand how to project the right image. Robert Ringers, "Winning Through Intimidation" is a good anecdotal strategy... Dan Kennedy's takeaway selling is another..As is Jay Abrahams Law of Preeminence.
The basic idea is to not care that much about the end result. When you raise VC money when you don't need it, you are in a much stronger position to negotiate. So too with Image, create the impression that you don't need the opportunity, deal, or whatever you are getting screwed out of and you will be in a position to demand the protections you need.
In a utopian world you would be right...But in the real world, even the good guys might screw you if it ever turns into a situation of You Vs. Them.
Ultimately, if having to choose between feeding my family or feeding yours, the choose is obvious even to nice guys.
Especially when you consider that sometimes being nice to one person is being cruel to another.
The key is to protect yourself...when dealing with bad people you know where you stand, so you have strong motivation to demand contracts, etc...
When dealing with genuinely nice people, whom you would never dream could possibly screw you, thats were you are most vulnerable, because you are less likely to demand the contract and protections you need, and when it comes to them vs. you, they will often choose themselves...
Semi Related - I read a quote from Warren Buffet that really resonated with me, "Honesty is an expensive gift. Don't expect it from cheap people."
I hate when people make it like its a feed my family choice like they live in a hut somewhere. Above a certain level of income the "feed my family" excuse is simply that. An excuse for otherwise inexcusable behavior.
Just be nice to people, its not that hard. The world especially the tech world isn't a zero sum game.
I used to work for a guy who cared deeply about all his employees to the point where he bought me a car when mine broke down.
Than the recession hit, times got tough, he had triplets, got a divorce and even had to lay off half his company.
He made promises to me when times were good that he couldn't keep when times were tough.
He cared about me, and yet, for a long time I thought he screwed me when he went back on a deal he made with me.
Lots of people are nice, but back them into a corner (even only in their own minds) and their survival instincts will kick in.
It is simply naive to think otherwise.
Protect Yourself, especially with Nice people who you trust.
> But in the real world, even the good guys might screw you if it ever turns into a situation of You Vs. Them.
Then I guess the "good guy" in your world is only a seemingly good guy (as PG may state it) in my world, since it would be at the core of my definition of a good guy to be fair even in a "you vs. them" situation.
> Ultimately, if having to choose between feeding my family or feeding yours, the choose is obvious even to nice guys.
It is rarely as easy as that. How about feeding your family involving you screwing me over vs feeding my family involving nobody screwing anyone?
Again, in a utopia you would be right, but in the real world, there are legitimate conflicts of interest, and times where its a question of who to screw not whether to or not.
Even the nicest guys when backed into a corner will kick into survival mode.
Like I said, sometimes being nice to one person is being cruel to another.
I would imagine no one ever does this unless they feel they have no choice.
I am not talking about opportunistic jerks waiting to screw you...I am talking about good people in bad circumstances... It is a very rare breed that can maintain perspective when their home is in foreclosure, etc...
That you're still saying things like "survival mode"† suggests that you're not absorbing what's being said. Call it maintenance mode (as in, "to maintain(2)"‡) if you want, and I'll buy that. But survival mode is far, far off.
You got me on a semantics issue... I think my point is still valid though.
Even really nice and good people might act in their own self interest when faced with a conflict. The perception of the magnitude of that conflict is relative, and a nice and good guys self-interest mode might be different than a jerks, but...
I still believe it's naive to think that when someone truly FEELS like they are backed into a corner, they will rationalize acting in their own self-interest, even if from someone elses perspective they are screwing them over.
We all have priorities, where we draw the line might be based on how good or bad we are... but everyone has a breaking point.
As of this writing, there are three responses to the comment of yours that I first replied to, each of them posted near-simultaneously with respect to each other. It's important to point out that all of them are calling you out on the same thing here.
(You downplay the issue when you throw out the "ah, semantics!" style resignation. This kind of comment is almost designed to frame it as if you were engaged in a debate over something and I caught you on a minor technicality that doesn't have any real importance to the actual topic at hand.)
Look, I'm not interested in "winning", or points-scoring, or something juvenile like that. What I am interested in is seeing the feeding-my-family "move" eliminated from honest discussion among reasonable people. This is precisely because the "I have to feed my family" refrain is dishonest and–as I said before–an unworthy tactic.
I don't know how to make you to understand this if you don't by now.
> I don't know how to make you to understand this if you don't by now.
I feel the same frustration as you :)
> This is precisely because the "I have to feed my family" refrain is dishonest and–as I said before–an unworthy tactic.
One last time I will try to explain my point. I agree, This argument might be dishonest, and should be eliminated...
but... That doesn't change the reality on the ground that many people, when feeling like they are about to lose something important will view it as a You vs. Them Scenario.
I have a problem with your point 3. With all respect but I think I heard that argument before in the context of women being sexually assaulted and the way they dress being to blame...
The correlation to this instance would be..."If someone is constantly sexually assaulted to the point where they EXPECT EVERYBODY to sexually assault them..."
In that case, I would offer this same advice... ask yourself if you are projecting an image that leads everybody to sexually assault you.
I am not justifying the behavior of walking over people (or assaulting people...)
I am simply offering a strategy to improve your lot if people are screwing you constantly.
There is a definite correlation between the image you project, how you are perceived and ultimately how you are treated.
Ignoring that reality is just being naive.
We are also talking about someone who is constantly being screwed, not someone who was assaulted once.
Robert Ringer, in his book "Winning Through Intimidation" postulates that the result you get from a negotiation is inversely proportionate to how intimidated you are."
just think about the last time you had to talk to a big VC or someone you were initimidated by, and consider whether you stood up for yourself or whether you were too scared to stand your ground.
Branding and image building is all about exactly this. Creating a deliberate impression on people before they need your product.
My experience has been that when someone "only expects bad things from people when they depnd on them" it means one of 3 things.
1. They have a hard time accepting responsibility and taking ownership of their own problems.
2. They are running with a really bad crowd, and need to go to the library to make some new friends.
3. They project an image that lets people walk all over them.
Everyone has problems that come up in their life, but if you haven't experienced nice people as being the norm... there is a better that 66% chance its something YOU ALONE CAN AND MUST CHANGE.