We don't review it, we just say it.

So it's not something you thought about.

We were open to it, but the actual results of LLM code generation are so uniformly poor that until there's substantive evidence of a change on that front, we're not willing to review on a case by case basis.

Ah, I meant review the policy, not the cases.

We will review the policy when one of the core developers interacts with an LLM regarding a real coding problem in our application and gets back something that isn't drivel.