Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Let's take the beautiful state of Massachusetts where I live. For foreigners: it's a liberal mecca, a pocket of Americans with a yearning for european lifestyle. Let's look at the government from a systems perspective and say that we prioritize individuals based on dollars spent on them, shall we?

- How much does the state spend for a pre-k child? <10k/year/child

- An incarcerated inmate? >100k/year/inmate

- Drug-use rehab? >50k/year/user-seeking-rehab

- How much does that leave parents to pay? >30k/year/child (again average, any place where there's a job it's closer to 50k pre-tax)

We don't prioritize children and our societies are actively hostile towards them in terms of dollars spent. As simple as that.





Doesn't explain countries like Japan, China, SK where drug use is extremely low and incarceration rates are far lower. Still no babies.

That's a fine argument, but if we're trying, let's start by spending on it first. We're america, that's what we do when we have a problem.

Actually what America usually does first is prioritize GDP growth over the interests of natural American citizens. I expect that trend to continue.

I find it really hard to buy that this is the reason people have 0 kids. Less sure, but if youre worried about cost youll just have 1 instead of 2 or 3. Seems to me that some people are just less interested in having kids now because theyd rather do other stuff.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: