Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Colonizing Antarctica is a few orders of magnitude easier than Mars and we've barely progressed with that

I hear this somewhat often, and I find it a bit disingenuous since it's not like we're trying that hard to colonize Antarctica, we're mostly preserving it as well as we can, no? And the existing Antarctic bases aren't total hellholes or anything, AFAIK the larger ones are relatively normal spaces with power and normal food and heated water.

I do agree with the overall point though for sure.



The same considerations apply to Mars.


Hence the "Reds" vs. "Greens" in the KSR Mars trilogy.


I always found it amusing that KSR's Greens were the side that would have in effect have destroyed the natural environment of Mars (by terraforming it), unlike our Greens who in general want to preserve the environment.


It's kinda poetic that, on Earth, Greens are sometimes accused of being Reds in disguise ;)


I think that's the point? :-)

The Reds want to preserve the environment and the Greens want to completely change it...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: