That still exposes the timestamp, and the shift just drops precision, so I'm not... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		michelpp 3 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: UUIDv47: Store UUIDv7 in DB, emit UUIDv4 outside (... That still exposes the timestamp, and the shift just drops precision, so I'm not sure what you're going for here.

sergeyprokhoren 3 months ago [–]

If you shift the timestamp forward by 5 thousand years, it can hardly be called just a decrease in precision.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact