Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

$500k for only 100 millions rows db also sounds crazy


The largest table was 100 million rows. They could have had hundreds more tables.


Also curious why every comment mentions just the number of rows as the only factor that matters. A 100M rows table of 3 integer columns is quite different from 50+ columns, 5 of which are text up to a few MB long.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: