I’m reminded of how I always think current cutting edge good examples of CG in movies looks so real and then, consistently, when I watch it again in 10 years it always looks distractingly shitty.
I honestly believe GP comment demonstrates a level of gullibility that AI hypesters are exploiting.
Generative LLMs are text[1] generators, statistical machines extruding plausible text.
To the extent that it a human believes it to be credible,
the output exhibits all the hallmarks of a confidence game.
Once you know the trick,
after Toto pulls back the curtain[2],
its not all that impressive.
1. I'm aware that LLMs can generate images and video as well. The point applies.
