Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

May I ask what your actual gripe is with level of spending that was going into research before?

Is there actual evidence that shows there was an issue that needed to be immediately addressed the way it was? Some evidence of "fraud" perhaps ?



Discussions with university researchers I know personally indicated an inappropriate amount was going to the university at large, rather than project funding.


Why not just address that singular issue (if true and truly problematic) just be addressed then get back to business as usual ?

How do you know the money going to the university isn't just forwarded onto the professors so they are funded? Doesn't sound that suspicious to me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: