Do you mean the one labelled "Khalsa Aid volunteers"? Are you suggesting that Khalsa Aid incorrectly took credit for the langar, or that Khalsa Aid has nothing to do with Sikhs?
I am saying that there is 30 second video with a headline, which shows nearly zero information about the events. And that if you take your reality from reddit headlines and 30 second videos, you will soon live an alternate reality, as this kind of messaging is very effective at making you believe things which are false.
If you think my post had anything to do with Kasha Aid (No idea and don't care what it is) or Sikhs, then I am afraid you did not read it properly.
The headline has says "Khalsa aid volunteers", so maybe make more of an effort paying attention to the video you're complaining about? You literally said:
> In the video you see precisely one person identifiable as a Sikh and many other people, who are clearly not Sikh, performing the same task. Most definitely it isn't "the Sikh community" doing anything. It isn't even clear who provided the resources here.
... and the video is labelled as volunteers for Khalsa Aid, a Sikh-funded and operated charity. Your very basic assumptions are based on your being underinformed by choice or mistake.
We are both ESL, but I challenge you to read carefully through this, two or three times maybe:
"If you think my post had anything to do with Kasha Aid (No idea and don't care what it is) or Sikhs, then I am afraid you did not read it properly."
Not everything is an attack on your people. But I always found it a bit strange how Indian people, Muslim Hindu or Sikh, get so defensive the moment anything remotely negative is said about them. Just to be clear: "If you think my post had anything to do with Kasha Aid (No idea and don't care what it is) or Sikhs, then I am afraid you did not read it properly."
Why would I accept your challenge? Your post and unwillingness to even spell "Khalsa" correctly speaks for the excellent faith and attention to detail that you're bringing to this discussion. Everything about your discussion can be summarized by this pair of mutually incompatible sentences:
> Not everything is an attack on your people.
And
> But I always found it a bit strange how Indian people, Muslim Hindu or Sikh, get so defensive the moment anything remotely negative is said about them.
Which one is true? Are you saying negative things, or is it not an attack? Feel free to answer, but as with the original reddit video, we are all free to decide ourselves.
