Sexualizing the product name at all is more hostile to women than the reference is hostile to men.

Are you suggesting women are less able to take hostilities than men ? Since now we have inuendos from both.

I'm suggesting that the "inuendos from both" is the wrong analysis and that the workplace issue would be the sexualization of the product name being used as a tool to harass women (there would probably also be comments made to men, but harassment would predominantly be towards women).

Context matters. In a 95% male profession, making hostile comments about women is absolutely more of an issue than similar comments about men. And vice versa in a predominantly female profession.

Hostilities from men towards women are much more dangerous and women have the correct response to be more vigilant about them.

Then why are men and women treated equally at all?

This is the right question