I tend to agree, and I'm not against student loan help (I paid my loans off years ago). Something along the lines of tuition caps in order to receive loans backed by the federal government (similar to how insurance companies cap what they pay regardless of what the medical provider bills)
That's not how federal student loans work. You can't borrow unlimited amounts to cover any amount of tuition, and unlike insurance companies, it's not the government paying the bill. For instance, you can only get $5500 for the first year. Tuition caps would be an orthogonal policy.
I'm aware of the caps and the fact that the loans are backed, not paid, by the government. However, attaching conditions to eligibility is a tool the government can wield.
This comes up so much, but there's no need to fight that battle (and it would be a big one). Put a max on the percentage of your income that needs to go to student loan repayment, like 7%, and a time limit on repayment, like 10 or 20 years.
The economics of higher education in the United States are definitely ripe for reform—especially for public institutions—but I think we have much better places to be looking for ideas than the health insurance industry.
That was just an analogy, not the source of the idea. Government has been playing the carrots and sticks game a lot longer than the insurance industry.
