> Wouldn’t it be even much better to do none of this? In Ruby `100.times do puts 'cause implies consequence' end` is valid code that will do that without any painful effort to make the aimed page.
Presumably it won’t be the only content on the page, the statements are going to be inside various other statements. Also I’m not sure how you’d execute Ruby code on a Blackboard.
> Using terse scriptural symbols per se doesn’t prevent to go into esoteric non-sense.
Who said you’d have to “go into esoteric non-sense”, whatever that means?
> And anything that can be expressed in graphical symbols can just as well and as clearly expressed in any spontaneous language if given the same careful attention.
Okay, but why woutd you want to use a word if a simple symbol does the trick? You have to define what it means either way and symbols have the advantage that you don’t need to translate them between languages.
Presumably it won’t be the only content on the page, the statements are going to be inside various other statements. Also I’m not sure how you’d execute Ruby code on a Blackboard.
> Using terse scriptural symbols per se doesn’t prevent to go into esoteric non-sense.
Who said you’d have to “go into esoteric non-sense”, whatever that means?
> And anything that can be expressed in graphical symbols can just as well and as clearly expressed in any spontaneous language if given the same careful attention.
Okay, but why woutd you want to use a word if a simple symbol does the trick? You have to define what it means either way and symbols have the advantage that you don’t need to translate them between languages.