Despite what they are claiming, they are clearly changing back the license because they felt the pain of not being Open Source anymore.
The proof that companies like that publicly under value the success that they owe to being Open Source.
But being able to use the term Open Source, by using AGPL, an OSI approved license, removes any questions, or fud, people might have.
Also it makes me laugh so much the guy is trying to victimize himself pretending that they are unjustly targeted by FUD when it is not FUD but a real existing problem.
The proof that companies like that publicly under value the success that they owe to being Open Source.
Also it makes me laugh so much the guy is trying to victimize himself pretending that they are unjustly targeted by FUD when it is not FUD but a real existing problem.