Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm more inclined to believe it's Chase-specific now, or at least more likely with Chase, esp. based on other anecdotes in this thread!

The only reason anecdotes in this thread are about Chase is that Chase is the bank you mentioned in your article. If you had mentioned any other of the big banks I am sure you would get similar anecdotes. All of the big banks work basically the same way. For example, as I commented in another response upthread, they probably all have similar "we can screw your business any time we like and there's nothing you can do about it" language in their terms of service.

> my experience with Chase is by far the worst I've personally experienced.

Have any of your experiences with other big banks been small business accounts? If not, that's an obvious reason for your Chase experience to be worse.



I’ve had business accounts with almost every large US bank. I’ve founded quite a few businesses - venture-backed and bootstrapped product and consulting companies, going back to the 90s. I’ll repeat: I’ve never had an experience as bad as the one I had with Chase. Not sure what would possess you to post something so condescending about a statement of opinion and then to make incorrect assumptions about the extent of my experience.


Also: the same company that got flagged by Chase had an account with Bank of America open at the same time and later opened accounts with a couple of other banks. No KYC issues with any of them despite exactly the same set of facts. And again, we did nothing even remotely shady or suspicious.


> I’ve had business accounts with almost every large US bank.

Ok. I would suggest making that very clear up front in your article. I think that would considerably increase the article's impact.


I’m not the OP and I didn’t write an article. I wrote a comment about my own experience with Chase, which you quoted and responded to.


> I’m not the OP and I didn’t write an article.

Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that. That was stupid of me.


Correction from the poster I was responding to: it is not his article. My comment about why the anecdotes in this thread are about Chase are still valid, but I did not realize that the poster I was responding to was not the article's author. So I should have said "mentioned in the article", and the last paragraph of my post is irrelevant to the poster I was responding to. Sorry for the confusion on my part.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: