I'm not 100% sure I'm understanding your suggestion, but if I am, the flats and sharps in the dots could be misleading. In the dots it, the accidentals would be relative to the tonic, but it wouldn't actually mean that the note being played is sharp or flat.
It wouldn't be, since you've already decided they refer to the note and not its position. It'll help keep you cognizant of the sharps and flats without looking at the bottom every time.
Although this is for piano, your scale at the bottom looks like a really wonky piano keyboard. The black keys are actually all the white keys. Unless this is for a harpsichord, but I digress. It does show that you haven't decided whether a sharp or flat would refer to the note name or its position. If it was numbers at the bottom, it would indeed mean something different than if it has the alphabetic note names there, as it does. That shows very well what at least one of the problems with this chart is.
The way this is laid out means you are constantly doing multiple translations in order to learn a scale.
