I believe the hardware designer was stiffed (according to some threads on Twitter)? There doesn't seem to be a summary of what happened anywhere, but from the reactions I've seen, it looks like DEFCON didn't pay a vendor for badge hardware, and the firmware has an easter egg showing that vendor.
Yes and no, they may have been informed in a non-public setting on _why_ DEFCON has refused to pay.
DEFCON themselves is likely to not state a reason publicly, so getting a "here's what I was told by DEFCON" is likely the closest thing that we're going to get for an answer.
I read it as tinged with the implication that the wronged party must have done something to deserve it. In retrospect, perhaps I was being too sensitive.