Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Then why aren't you spending 100% of your income on trying to change policy regarding zoning/density and transit availability?


Probability of success is too low to make it a worthwhile investment. Also, affecting change in zoning/local efforts is useless. It would have to be a federal (and maybe global) level tax on fossil fuels, otherwise the arbitrage opportunities make it ineffective.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: