Meta runs on UGC (User Generated Content), so making it easy and cheap to make great content is in their best interests. If they can reduce the cost of making a Billboard 100 quality song to $0, or make it so anyone with a 1.3MP webcam can use AI to get MKBHD level quality streams going, they:
- increase the amount of content being generated
- increase the quality of that content
- make the content cheaper to acquire/license (since there's dramatically more supply)
I understand but Code LLama or CoTracker do not create content for Facebook/Instagram. Moreover, AI-generated content is not so engageable as a human-generated content. I don't think the purpose is to have more content at lower price.
The theory makes sense, but it's not clear what its complement is?
Meta runs on UGC (User Generated Content), so making it easy and cheap to make great content is in their best interests. If they can reduce the cost of making a Billboard 100 quality song to $0, or make it so anyone with a 1.3MP webcam can use AI to get MKBHD level quality streams going, they:
- increase the amount of content being generated
- increase the quality of that content
- make the content cheaper to acquire/license (since there's dramatically more supply)