Of course there isn't anything more dangerous than the government. That is the whole point of a monopoly on force and detention. If done properly it is used to keep people from harming others.
Also, the cell phone in your pocket broadcasts your location a few times a second, and the corporations with that data love working with the government.
Well, you aren't forced to live in a house or use a toilet or buy your food. If your conditions are 'forced' then I guess the bar is pretty damn low, but everyone I know wants to operate in modern society and to do that one requires the use of services run by large quasi-monopolistic corporations.
Do you think anyone is convinced by your simplistic rhetorical device?
Let's some questions which don't lead immediately to your 'thought-terminating cliche':
What does having a monolith contribute to society both in terms of value and innovation?
Are there examples where this ended up being beneficial?
Is it a good idea to allow the logical conclusion of free market capitalism be one monopolistic entity which has stifled or bought all competition? What do you think there is to gain by doing such a thing?
My ad blocker blocks analytics on mobile and desktop that takes care of Google and Facebook.
Whose left?