It’s really not upsetting that “people exist who don’t agree with the prevailing narrative” especially in science, because the “prevailing narrative” has extremely good reason to exist, and more importantly, especially where physics is concerned, the prevailing narrative almost certainly worked, and gave correct answers to the questions that were asked.

The problem with the “prevailing narrative” in physics is never that it’s “wrong”. It’s that it’s either not deep enough or not wide enough an explanation.

Even Einstein’s upending Newtonian physics abs basically proving it as “wrong” as any prevailing narrative can probably be proven has made little difference in the usage of Newtonian physics, which still continues to be employed for nearly everything it would have been if relativity was never discovered.

It just means that we now have a theory that can answer questions that Newtonian physics could not. And we have a clearer and broader picture of what reality is. It means that we have become aware of unknown assumptions and approximations in our earlier understanding, that we didn’t even know about.