This is not whataboutism.

GP identifies an action that analogous and holds certain properties as the original action, in the process illuminating how the issues of approach A exist in approach B.

But it is. "You're concerned about your data when using ChatGPT but you're probably using Google so your concerns are invalid"

They are not expressing that the concerns are invalid, they are expressing that one is held onto a higher standard than the other.

Agree to disagree then.

> They are not expressing that the concerns are invalid

> Agree to disagree then

Since you're discussing what I was expressing, I can tell you who's correct, since I know what I was expressing. And you're wrong. I wasn't expressing that the concerns are invalid. They're very valid.

Instead, what I was expressing was that OP doesn't actually have those concerns, not that they're invalid.