It would be cool if it identified the game engine (clue "Mathf"), or said something about the programming language. What it actually simulates is more obscure (would a human find out?), but got a general idea. Nice work!
> Overall, this code could be used to create a simple oscillating motion for an object in a game or simulation.
Damn, I was gonna say "it wiggles the object" but this covers it just fine. Between this and the GPT4 examples where it explains the humour behind a random joke, I can't help but wonder how much longer the "it's just some statistics" crowd will be able to keep it up.
It's a pretty useless statement anyway unless you are working in philosophy or a related field.
As with any technology the critical questions revolve about it's usefulness, it's limitations and it's risks.
Whether it's "just statistics" or whether some arbitrary goalposts were moved by someone is only useful for internet points. A breakthrough development does not need defending, if thrives no matter the head wind.
It would be cool if it identified the game engine (clue "Mathf"), or said something about the programming language. What it actually simulates is more obscure (would a human find out?), but got a general idea. Nice work!