Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
1.5 Years after the west dropped the AstraZeneca vaccine WHO still recommends it (who.int)
2 points by noxer on Feb 8, 2023 | hide | past | favorite | 5 comments


Safe and effective (for the poor)!


Is it safe? I think so.

Is it effective? I think it has only a 70%-80% reduction of the hospitalization cases. So it's not as effective as the mRNA vaccines that have a 90%-95% reduction of the hospitalization cases.

Is it cheaper? I think so, but I can't find the numbers. And IIRC it's easier to transport and keep at remote sites.

Is it a good option for poor countries? Probably yes.

[Hi from Argentina! We used a mix of all the vaccines that were available, because nobody had enough stock. I got AstraZeneca x2 and Moderna x3. I almost got Pfizer, but I went one day after the stock got depleted. My wife got a few Sputnik or Sinopharm and later a few Moderna or Pfizer, I already forgot the details. Now that everyone is has natural and artificial immunity, the difference is probably not a big deal outside the risk groups.]


Why do you think its safe when it was obviously dropped in the west after the thousands and thousands of severe side effects emerged and not because of its effectiveness. What kind of logic would make it not safe in Europe/UK but safe in India?

Also these % are completely irrelevant noways as all these vaccines are for COVID variants that are no longer in circulation and the prevention of hospitalization is minuscule compared to the risk of side effects.


Don't let the best be the enemy of good.


No sure what you mean by that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: