Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Reading 2k+ commits is a big waste of time.

Forcing yourself to read every commit to a project you "like" in order contribute to it is putting the cart before the horse. Just because you "like" a project doesn't mean you will have the skills to contribute usefully to it. This isn't a bad thing. I "like" GCC, but I don't have the skills to contribute to it. I'm not losing any sleep over this, and I'm definitely not thinking about reading every commit to GCC in chronological order.

If you use a project, you might find a bug or some deficiency in it. Then it might happen that you have the skills to quickly fix this problem. Either that, or this bug causes you so many problems or slows you down so much that it becomes worth it for you to develop the skills to fix the problem.



I like this approach to FOSS contributions, thanks for the answer, sfpotter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: