> Virtue signaling. A loaded term, yes. But it is exactly why these discussions go off the rails. Nutritional 'science' doesn't even really exist, so you can always find something out there that sounds very objective and intelligence which will back up the positions you already hold on faith.
What you're describing is more confirmation bias than virtue signaling. Certainly there's plenty of both here.
What you're describing is more confirmation bias than virtue signaling. Certainly there's plenty of both here.