Yeah, and there's still a big gap between what data tells us and how to create policy. Sometimes waiting for conclusive evidence isn't possible and when you see warning signs you have to make recommendations. Especially considering the potential downside which in this case is really nothing. Eating meat may not be a terrible menace, but eating less meat is hardly a burden on anyone.
The health risks of eating unprocessed red meat may have been overstated, but there is still some evidence that has to be considered. And the article itself says that while the evidence of danger from meat consumption may be a proxy for correlated lifestyle changes so this narrow finding doesn't actually negate policy. Pushing people to eat whole grains, fruits and vegetables still stands as the best option.
The health risks of eating unprocessed red meat may have been overstated, but there is still some evidence that has to be considered. And the article itself says that while the evidence of danger from meat consumption may be a proxy for correlated lifestyle changes so this narrow finding doesn't actually negate policy. Pushing people to eat whole grains, fruits and vegetables still stands as the best option.