Does it really, in practice? Looking at the two systems, I would genuinely trust the US system less.
Also, you are wrong about admissibility. It is not true that everything is allowed, it depends on context. Also, what happens even when the thing is admitted is that police can be punished for breaking rules. Not by changing result of the court, but by punishing the police. And that is super big one.
Plus, most case in US are not even going through court. 96% or so are done by guilty plea. Going through court is super expensive and you risk much higher punishment.
US courts are notoriously deferential to cops and prodecutors. It just does not strikes me a system to trust all that much.
Also, you are wrong about admissibility. It is not true that everything is allowed, it depends on context. Also, what happens even when the thing is admitted is that police can be punished for breaking rules. Not by changing result of the court, but by punishing the police. And that is super big one.
Plus, most case in US are not even going through court. 96% or so are done by guilty plea. Going through court is super expensive and you risk much higher punishment.
US courts are notoriously deferential to cops and prodecutors. It just does not strikes me a system to trust all that much.