That's the thing about this stuff: it's voluntary. That's the point the above commenters are trying to make. We don't need a consensus of you all to do what we want, and if you don't want to be involved, don't.
I take it seriously enough; I have a civic interest in harm reduction in this area.
“Voluntary” cuts it when you’re talking amongst yourselves, but again: this is a public forum, not one specially for your interests. I get to voice common sense objections; that’s the point of this place.
But the point being made above is that we need someone's respect, someone's consensus, someone's approval to do what we are doing. And to that I say if you don't like what we are doing don't get involved.
> And to that I say if you don't like what we are doing don't get involved.
This, of course, only holds as far as cryptocurrencies remain a non-risk to most "main street" investors. But they're creeping towards that group (as the next biggest free pool of capital), and I have a civic interest in those people not losing their shirts.
That's the thing about this stuff: it's voluntary. That's the point the above commenters are trying to make. We don't need a consensus of you all to do what we want, and if you don't want to be involved, don't.