Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The worst tech team you've ever seen and yet they are generating 20 million a year? I think you should give them the respect they deserve and understand the limitations they have been under.

My thoughts:

* Get the code in source control straight away

* Get the infrastructure stable and up to date if it's not

* Get CI pipelines set up. As part of this, make sure the code is running through a static analyser. This will give you a backlog of things to work on.

* Organize an external penetration test to be carried out

* Investigate updating and/or consolidating the software libraries used (Jquery etc)

* Choose a page/feature to update on its own. Bring it up to date.

At this point, you should be in a much better state and you will have learned a lot.



> The worst tech team you've ever seen and yet they are generating 20 million a year? I think you should give them the respect they deserve and understand the limitations they have been under.

If the right opportunity is there, you can make a lot of money on an awfully built product that barely keeps it together. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t a lot of risks involved with that and that things can’t go south in a hurry.

I’m obviously not familiar with this project, but it sounds like a lot of things many’d consider table stakes are missing, especially for such a large source of revenue. Perhaps I’m not imaginitive enough, but I can’t come up with any limitations they might’ve been under that would justify that. I think it’s fair to call that out, even if they happen to make money despite this.


There is definitely loads to fix and it does sound like the team was inexperienced but they were successful it seems.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: