The article title: "Why companies are interested in Myers-Briggs types"
The article's answer: "We just don’t know."
Whole bunch of words in that article and some interesting background, but zero effort to address the title of the piece. It's like they meant to be going somewhere, provided some interesting background information, and then just stopped. No hypotheses, no interviewing a company to ask them why, just a shrug.
If you wanted to say "Companies shouldn't use Myers-Briggs," you should have made that the title.
The article's answer: "We just don’t know."
Whole bunch of words in that article and some interesting background, but zero effort to address the title of the piece. It's like they meant to be going somewhere, provided some interesting background information, and then just stopped. No hypotheses, no interviewing a company to ask them why, just a shrug.
If you wanted to say "Companies shouldn't use Myers-Briggs," you should have made that the title.