Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> So please explain how “Own this NFT that points to Snoop’s Bored Ape” or “Own this NFT that points to Snoop’s NFT that points to his Bored Ape” is grounds for any legal action. There is no misrepresentation, deception, copying, infringement, or whatnot.

The thing is, the law isn't just a regex you apply to what the seller said and it tells you if the seller broke the law. That ain't how it works. At the end of the day it's going to come down to whether the seller mislead the buyer.



all it takes is one court case for everyone to learn what not to say, while doing the same action




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: