Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It doesn’t have to be like this. Even when I was CTO, I’d submit my code in a PR and my team would pull me up on mistakes and inconsistencies. It was really annoying! And also great.

I can imagine that you had fun mingling with the commoners for a day, now try it on all of your actual work, and with the whole C-level team gang up on you for each review.

> about how the organisation cuts code

You don't have any guidelines for how the organisation cuts code, and that's why you like the review process, because it covers up for that.



Why the hate? You’ve obviously had some shitty experiences but I’ve never done anything to deserve your attitude.

> I can imagine that you had fun mingling with the commoners for a day, now try it on all of your actual work, and with the whole C-level team gang up on you for each review.

You literally know nothing about me, my experiences or how I conduct my life, and rather than listen to people with a different experience to yours, you choose borderline abuse.

This is the comments section of HN. Take a break and get some perspective.


I agree with the others commenting here and can't relate to your experience at all. Review is a huge positive and while it does "slow things down" it usually is preventing people from slamming into walls at high speed, so that's a positive too.

Maybe your work experience is mostly in a high stress, prototype-heavy environment where it's more important to launch something than it is to have a maintainable, incrementally improving codebase? I worked at a consultancy like that and it was very different from "big product" long term work.

As for the social dynamics, it sounds like your workplace culture just blows.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: