I was implying consistently good. As in, the ~ 90% protection was relatively uni... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		somewhereoutth on April 10, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Trapped in lockdown, Shanghai residents turn to We... I was implying consistently good. As in, the ~ 90% protection was relatively uniform

peteradio on April 10, 2022 [–]

Sources? Are you sure you are not conflating consistently higher specific antibody titers with uniformly better clinical outcomes?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact