> analysis on whether your opponent has made a mistake cannot assume that they are so smart they'd never make a mistake.
why not? You assume they are perfect logical agents, capable of making any true deductions from known information. After all, this is what you'd do in chess.
The errors they could make are things like forced errors or deliberate misinformtion from the west.
why not? You assume they are perfect logical agents, capable of making any true deductions from known information. After all, this is what you'd do in chess.
The errors they could make are things like forced errors or deliberate misinformtion from the west.