Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So, besides the possibility that you are flat out wrong (as another commentator claims you may be), let's assume that you're right.

1. This is still horrific UX/UI 2. The culture internally at Google seems to have a "we know better than the users" attitude in all things. 3. Query rewriting is a horrific technique in general with almost zero value to life/society outside of fixing spelling errors. Whatever your A/B testing says about it's purported utility is polluted by Google's own dark patterns and political whims of the managers who run the internal search organizations.

It helps to actually know better than your users if you want to take the attitude in number 2. I don't believe that you or Google knows better than it's users, for many reasons previously enumerated in this thread and others.

One day Google search is going to be displaced and it's current utilization of query rewriting techniques will be one of the fundamental reasons for this.

You should take the absolutely massive amount of recent criticism and the fact that users repeatedly claim it's happening in the face of your claim it's not seriously rather than literally blaming the users writ large for a problem that is fundementally with the behavior of Google search.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: