Yeah, the definitions and analogies in the linked article are correct, but I doubt they’d be entirely clear to the uninitiated since they explain the processes but not applications for all three concepts. We get the “how”s but not all of the “why”s.
I suspect it’s partly for the reason you’ve mentioned: the line between uses can sometimes get blurry. It’s a decent article that could do with some additional clarifications.
I suspect it’s partly for the reason you’ve mentioned: the line between uses can sometimes get blurry. It’s a decent article that could do with some additional clarifications.