Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Also, I am curious about your findings Re: ARS Article, which I need to read.

Frankly, I am learning how to build more things. Probably will need to.



To be honest I don't know if it came to pass or not. I'm still trying to find more info on what the current Windows logo requirements for Secure Boot on x86 actually are.


I will look too. Ask around. I am a ways away from this stuff right at a time I wish I were much closer.


The core point you made is what counts.

They do hold the keys. That is the unacceptable part.


> They do hold the keys. That is the unacceptable part.

Exactly. The issue isn't the TPM itself, such a device could even empower us. The issue is who holds the keys. Those with the keys own the machine.

I started discussion about that in this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28978028




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: