On a related point, while doing some Unicode research, I discovered that the Unicode project itself uses wikidata as an (untrusted) source for some data, translations of names, if I recall correctly, cf. https://www.unicode.org/review/pri408/pri408-tr51-QID.html although that's not the reference I encountered earlier today. Their system is set up so that if the Unicode organization corrects something previously read, it takes precedence over what was pulled from wikidata, but otherwise the wikidata value will be used.