Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yet another Paul Graham stream of consciousness. He presents a thesis but forgets to support it as he streams out another essay. I take issue with this fundamental thesis: "There are three ingredients in great work: natural ability, practice, and effort."

He doesn't distinguish between practice and effort. In my view, practice takes effort and effort occurs during practice, they are two dimensions of the same thing, which is really just "experience." You don't gain experience without effortful practice.

Furthermore, where is his mention of accountability to a team? One of the greatest motivators is having helpful allies who tell you what they want from you, provide tips how to do it (leveraging their experience), and then give you the keys you need to work hard and get great things done.

Another lackluster article from PG that rockets to the top of HN within an hour. There are much better writers out there, I'm not sure why his work is so lauded.



> Yet another Paul Graham stream of consciousness.

Absurd to expect anything else. I missed the part of the essay where it pretended to be... whatever you seem to think it should.

You're not sure why it's popular and here you are responding to it, attaching to it and reacting, building on it. It sounds like you did in fact get a lot out of the essay, just like the rest of the peanut gallery.


Because this website is pretty much centered around people who read/liked PGs essays.


>rockets to the top of HN within an hour

He gets extra credit on HN for creating HN




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: