By fighting the issue instead of the man, just like with any other issue.

Vetoing people at work for their political views is much worse in my opinion.

Context: I am a pro-gay marriage person in a country where it was legalized in 2004.

I'm for gay marriage and downvoted you. How can you conflate the two aspects? Is it not possible for a person to hold backwards views about certain things and still be a good CEO?

But would he be a credible steward of gay employees if he doesn't even think they should engage in marriage, and by extension forge families? Credibility is the job of the CEO, including moral credibility.

Having a vision which encompasses society and life is part of the responsibility of a company which has been granted license to operate in society. What is Brandan Eich's vision of gay family life? One that should be banned by law, a cause which is serious enough to warrant his financial contribution? His actions as a man of experienced wisdom says Yes.

Any more than you can be a credible steward of Republican employees as a Democrat? It is possible to set aside your personal views of people on the job…

Better opsec on Brendans part.

Don't hire people who look for something to be insulted by.

Stronger laws to protect peoples personal lives from media and activists.

Surprisingly many upvotes, so I think it might be good to clarify something:

> Don't hire people who look for something to be insulted by.

For context: I used to be like that, looking for a fight, even though it was for different cause.

I don't believe in behaving that way anymore, and I think I might have done more harm than good back then even if I had the best intentions.

It's hardly ideal. But, to counter - you don't have to trust Brendan Eich that there's no anti-gay, anti-Uyghur, etc code in Firefox.

You do have to trust google, because of the telemetry. Trusting any powerful party based on public, virtuous statements is... "optimistic" is one word. "Reckless" is another.