You are not alone there. I tried multiple times to understand what the author tries to convey, without being really sure to grasp it.
At first I thought that it was simply some advocacy for taking the time to route legacy content using 302, but it also seems to be some sub-domain trick with years…?
At first I thought that it was simply some advocacy for taking the time to route legacy content using 302, but it also seems to be some sub-domain trick with years…?
It's really confusing to me.