Actually there is.
People deal differently with the loss, but eventually they all get over it, because it is a natural process.
A severe refusal to move on is not what one can call a good thing.
Think about the people around you and the consequences it could have.
statements of fact like that with regards to a fairly unexplored territory are worse than useless, they're damaging.
By what criteria do we know that this is a 'severe refusal to move on'?
Should we accuse people who peruse old photographs from their history of the same 'severe refusal'?
Why can't this AI idea be just yet another tool at our disposal for memory recall and recollection?
Why paint this as some mental ineptitude, rather than just an archival opportunity?
Most stores of data have possible consequence by their mere existence. What's different here exactly?
Would the idea be more palatable if, rather than the clickbait ideas of immortality, it was framed as a trained chatbot?
Actually there is.
People deal differently with the loss, but eventually they all get over it, because it is a natural process.
A severe refusal to move on is not what one can call a good thing.
Think about the people around you and the consequences it could have.