The point is that giving over the names would be bad. What he did is better.

Supporting people's right to self-determination despite negative business consequences is admirable, and I wish we saw more of it.

far too many US based CEOs whose companies have a presence in China have remained completely silent. I wonder what it would take for them to act

> I wonder what it would take for them to act

Losing money

>He could have kept quiet and given over the names like 90% percent of people in that situation would do.

Do you feel that would be the best choice?

the best moral decision he could make, obviously