Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
pixl97
on Feb 20, 2019
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
U.S. Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to ...
>The car is potentially proceeds of crime
Then the state must prove that case rather than it being in implicit assumption.
Theodores
on Feb 20, 2019
[–]
In the UK the prosecution - 'Crown Prosecution Service' - present the mobile phone evidence and the accused is able to provide evidence for legitimate income. The court then decide whether to take the house and cars. Simple.
pixl97
on Feb 20, 2019
|
parent
[–]
Um, no that is not the state proving that the car was bought with 'drug money' that is the accused inability to prove that it wasn't.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
Then the state must prove that case rather than it being in implicit assumption.