Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> buy up the local infrastructure (housing, office space, coffee shops, etc), and turn around and rent / sell to the startups that you just funded. This would pad the ROI, so even a company that crashes and burns after 5 years would still be profitable on the basis of the rents paid.

You can never turn a profit on rent paid out of money you gave to someone, just like it's impossible to turn a profit on purchases your employees make from you with the wages you pay them. You're always better off just keeping the money.



It's someone else's money.

- VC raises money to invest

- VC or the individual partners buy the infrastructure (or already owns it through different channels)

- VC instructs companies it funds to use infrastructure it owns

$$

Now, of course there's interest in successes in the fund, but even when a bet doesn't pan out the VC firm can profit


That does not "pad the ROI". It lowers the ROI of the fund. It may launder some money from the fund into a VC's personal pockets, but that's not the same thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: